Endnotes or Footnotes?
The book has been out a little over a year now (and we have almost sold out the third printing) -- but one comment has come to me several times. People tell me that they wish the book had endnotes. I had someone tell me this last week after I gave a lecture. I had the book in my hand, so I opened it to page 218 and showed her that the book has endnotes -- pages 218 to 233 note the source for every single sentence in the book which could be taken objectively (i.e., statements of fact are all noted).
For example, on page 176 I mention that an architectural historian examined the building and wrote a report. This section is found under the heading of "Lingering controversies: the Door Controversy." On page 229 of my endnotes (which are titled "Notes" -- which I believe is the most common name for a section of notes) under the heading Lingering controversies -- the Door Controversy, I write:
"Harrington's report is The Historical American Building Survey: Italian Hall HABS No MI-425. There is a copy at the MTU Archives."
So, any reader who was curious about my statement could see where I found it and go find it themselves. most of my other notes are like that -- when they refer to a particular sentence my note begins with the first few words of the sentence I am noting. This method of noting is becoming more common in the publishing industry because 1) it is much easier to read the text and 2) people can still look up the sources if they so desire.
Steve
Posted by
at
11:22:39
|
Permanent Link
|
|